The Water Depth Damage Curve: 626,886 NFIP Claims Analysed

Illustration: a residential wall showing a clear floodwater tide line at roughly two feet, with staining below and clean surface above.

The finding

Water depth damage in flood losses follows a curve, not a straight line. Across 626,886 National Flood Insurance Program claims filed since 2015, median building damage rises from $18,842 at under one foot of water to $63,020 at two feet, a 3.3 times increase. Above roughly three feet the curve flattens. The first two feet of water do most of the financial damage.

Headline figures

626,886NFIP claims analysed, 2015 to 2026FEMA OpenFEMA
$18,842Median damage under one footFEMA NFIP
$63,020Median damage at two feetFEMA NFIP
3.3xIncrease across the first two feetDerived

Key findings

  1. Median building damage at two feet of water ($63,020) is 3.3 times the median under one foot ($18,842).
  2. The steepest single step is the first foot: median damage rises 2.2 times from under one foot to one foot.
  3. Above three feet the curve flattens. Median damage at five feet ($68,449) is close to the two foot figure, not double it.
  4. 260,817 claims (42.3%) are coded as a combination of causes including sewer backup, the single largest cause category.
  5. Only 403,505 of 626,886 claims carry both a plausible depth and a damage amount, which is the sample this analysis uses.
  6. 13,551 claims record a depth of exactly 99 feet, which is a sentinel value rather than a measurement.
  7. 17,085 claims record a negative depth, which the dataset uses for water below the first floor.

The finding in one chart

Median NFIP building damage by water depthMEDIAN NFIP BUILDING DAMAGE BY WATER DEPTH0 ft18,8421 ft41,2962 ft63,0203 ft68,6214 ft71,9065 ft68,4496 ft53,6517 ft51,0508 ft48,3369 ft54,64410 ft55,830
Median building damage amount by recorded water depth, NFIP claims with loss year 2015 or later and a depth between 0 and 10 feet. n = 403,505. Source: FEMA OpenFEMA NFIP Redacted Claims v3, retrieved 4 October 2026.

Why the first two feet matter most

The shape of this curve is not obvious in advance. It would be reasonable to expect damage to scale with depth, because more water means more wet material. That is not what the claims show. Our contents restoration report tests whether contents damage follows the same curve.

Median damage climbs steeply through the first two feet, from $18,842 to $63,020, then effectively plateaus. A plausible reading is that the first two feet already reach the components that cost the most to replace: flooring, underlay, the bottom of the drywall, baseboards, cabinetry, and mechanical equipment sitting at floor level. Once those are gone, additional depth adds wall height but little new category of loss until the water reaches a second storey. Our guide to flood damage restoration explains where flood cuts are made and why.

This is an association in claims data, not a causal finding. The claims record what was paid, not what was physically destroyed, and deeper floods differ from shallow ones in more ways than depth.

Median damage foot by foot

Water depth Claims Median building damage Mean building damage
0 ft 113,601 $18,842 $45,375
1 ft 148,318 $41,296 $64,402
2 ft 60,260 $63,020 $87,494
3 ft 30,627 $68,621 $94,225
4 ft 17,844 $71,906 $103,411
5 ft 10,364 $68,449 $102,761
6 ft 7,392 $53,651 $94,140
7 ft 4,943 $51,050 $93,523
8 ft 4,608 $48,336 $97,192
9 ft 2,812 $54,644 $113,990
10 ft 2,736 $55,830 $103,770
NFIP claims, loss year 2015 or later, depth 0 to 10 feet, buckets with at least 200 claims. Source: FEMA OpenFEMA NFIP Redacted Claims v3, retrieved 4 October 2026.

What causes the water

Cause of damage Claims Share
Combination of causes, including sewer backup 260,817 42.3%
Stream, river or lake overflow 137,758 22.3%
Tidal water overflow 108,346 17.6%
Other causes 106,967 17.4%
Accumulation of rainfall or snowmelt 1,377 0.2%
Code D 571 0.1%
Code A 347 0.1%
Code B 181 0.0%
Cause of damage codes on NFIP claims with loss year 2015 or later. n = 616,477. Labels from the FEMA data dictionary. Source: FEMA OpenFEMA, retrieved 4 October 2026.

The largest single category is a combination of causes that includes sewer backup. For a restoration contractor that matters because it signals a contaminated loss rather than a clean one, which changes what can be dried in place and what has to be removed. Our guide to IICRC water categories covers that distinction.

Claims by year

Loss year Claims in this sample
2015 34,581
2016 85,497
2017 145,681
2018 42,625
2019 35,312
2020 33,185
2021 46,699
2022 60,262
2023 21,690
2024 102,054
2025 13,143
2026 6,157
Claims by year of loss within the retrieved sample. The 2025 and 2026 counts are incomplete because claims are filed and settled after the loss. Source: FEMA OpenFEMA, retrieved 4 October 2026.

Data quality: the depth field is dirty

Most published work using this dataset does not say what follows, so we are stating it plainly. The water depth field cannot be used as retrieved.

Issue Claims affected How we handled it
Depth recorded as exactly 99 feet 13,551 Excluded. This is a sentinel value, not a measurement.
Negative depth 17,085 Excluded from the curve. The dataset uses negative values for water below the first floor level.
Depth above 20 feet 30,953 Excluded. Residential flood depths above 20 feet are not plausible at this frequency.
No depth recorded 76,981 Excluded from depth analysis, retained for cause and year counts.
Data quality treatment applied before any figure in this report was computed.

After those exclusions the analysis sample is 403,505 claims, which is 64% of the retrieved rows. Every figure above is computed on that sample.

Method

How we counted. We retrieved 626,886 NFIP redacted claim records with a loss year of 2015 or later from the FEMA OpenFEMA API on 4 October 2026. We kept claims with a recorded water depth between 0 and 10 feet and a non-zero building damage amount, which leaves 403,505 claims. We grouped those by whole foot of depth and computed the median and mean building damage amount for each bucket, reporting only buckets with at least 200 claims. Medians are reported in preference to means because the distribution is right skewed. No inflation adjustment is applied, so figures across years are nominal.

Reproduce this

Reproduce this

Endpoint
https://www.fema.gov/api/open/v3/NfipClaims
Query
$filter=yearOfLoss ge 2015&$select=state,yearOfLoss,waterDepth,causeOfDamage,buildingDamageAmount,contentsDamageAmount,amountPaidOnBuildingClaim,occupancyType
Rows retrieved
626,886 claims
Retrieved
4 October 2026

The API pages at 5,000 rows via $top and $skip. No API key is required. Re-running this query will return a larger set as newer claims are added.

What this does not show

What this does not show

  • These are insured flood losses only. NFIP covers policyholders. Uninsured flood damage, and every water loss that is not a flood (burst pipes, appliance failures, sewer backups outside a flood event) is absent from this dataset entirely.
  • Damage amount is not restoration cost. The field records the assessed damage on the claim, which is not the same as what a contractor billed or what the work cost.
  • Depth is self-reported on the claim. The data quality section above shows how unreliable the field is before cleaning.
  • No inflation adjustment. Figures spanning 2015 to 2026 are nominal dollars.
  • Association, not causation. Deeper floods differ from shallow floods in duration, contamination and building type, not only in depth.

Most quotable figures

  1. Median NFIP building damage rises 3.3 times across the first two feet of water, from $18,842 to $63,020 (FEMA OpenFEMA NFIP claims, 2015 to 2026, n = 403,505).
  2. Above three feet the damage curve flattens: median damage at five feet is $68,449, close to the two foot figure.
  3. 42.3% of NFIP claims since 2015 are coded as a combination of causes including sewer backup.
  4. 13,551 NFIP claims record a water depth of exactly 99 feet, a sentinel value that must be excluded before analysis.

Questions this report answers

How much damage does one foot of water cause?

In NFIP claims filed since 2015, the median building damage amount at one foot of water is $41,296, against $18,842 at under one foot.

Does damage keep rising with depth?

Not proportionally. Median damage climbs steeply to about three feet and then flattens. At five feet the median is $68,449, not far above the two foot figure of $63,020.

Why is the first foot so expensive?

A plausible reading is that the first foot already reaches flooring, underlay, the base of the drywall, baseboards and floor-level mechanical equipment. Those are the components that cost most to replace, and additional depth adds wall area rather than new categories of loss.

Does this cover burst pipes and appliance leaks?

No. NFIP covers flood losses for policyholders only. Water losses from plumbing failures are not in this dataset.

Is the water depth field reliable?

Not as retrieved. 13,551 claims record exactly 99 feet and 17,085 record a negative depth. We exclude both, along with depths above 20 feet.

What is the largest cause of NFIP flood damage?

A combination of causes including sewer backup, at 42.3% of claims since 2015.

Can I reuse this data?

Yes. The tables and derived figures are released under CC BY 4.0 with attribution to Remediation Insider. The underlying claims data is public and available from FEMA.

How to cite

Remediation Insider. The Water Depth Damage Curve. https://remediationinsider.com/water-depth-damage-curve/ (retrieved 4 October 2026).

Data and tables in this report are released under CC BY 4.0. Attribution: Remediation Insider.

Sources

  1. Federal Emergency Management Agency. FEMA OpenFEMA NFIP Redacted Claims, v3. Claims with loss year 2015 or later. 626,886 records retrieved 4 October 2026.
  2. FEMA OpenFEMA Terms and Conditions.
  3. Cause of damage code labels are taken from the FEMA OpenFEMA data dictionary for the NfipClaims dataset.
  4. No survey, interview or physical inspection was conducted for this report. Every figure is computed from the retrieved claims file.

This product uses the Federal Emergency Management Agency’s OpenFEMA API, but is not endorsed by FEMA. The Federal Government or FEMA cannot vouch for the data or analyses derived from these data after the data have been retrieved from the Agency’s website(s).